This Article Was First Published on Deythere.
- What Happened: Pause on Hong Kong Stablecoin Projects
- Regulatory Context and Beijing’s Strategic Play
- What’s This Mean for Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Scene?
- Conclusion
- Glossary
- Frequently Asked Questions About Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Regulation Update
- Why did the Chinese regulators decide to pull the plug on Hong Kong’s stablecoin plans?
- What was Hong Kong’s role in the stablecoin scene before this regulatory shake-up?
- Does this mean the end for stablecoin issuance in Hong Kong?
- How does this update affect stablecoin issuance and markets around the world?
There’s been a major change in digital-currency plans for two heavyweight Chinese tech companies: Ant Group and JD.com. Both firms have pulled the plug on their plans to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong, largely due to direct interference from mainland regulators.
According to a news report, the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) and the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) have been advising against letting private companies like these issue their own digital currencies, citing concerns about monetary sovereignty and competition with Beijing’s own digital-yuan program, the e-CNY.
What Happened: Pause on Hong Kong Stablecoin Projects
Both Ant Group and JD.com were gearing up to participate in Hong Kong’s stablecoin pilot program, with the region having introduced a stablecoin licensing regime in May, which came into force in August.
Ant Group had even announced in June that it would be applying for a license once the application process opened.
But mid-October saw a change of directive from Beijing to stop all efforts to issue stablecoins. A source close to the matter said, “The real regulatory concern is, who has the right to mint coinage, the central bank or any private company on the market?”
This stablecoin regulation update makes it clear that Beijing views digital currency issuance as firmly in the hands of the state, even in places like Hong Kong, which enjoys a degree of autonomy.
Regulatory Context and Beijing’s Strategic Play
The stablecoin regulation update has come at a time when Beijing is doing its best to assert control over the digital finance space. The PBoC and CAC are worried that privately issued stablecoins could undermine state control over currency or allow for speculative asset flows.
Sources suggest that regulators are spooked by the idea that “privately issued currencies could challenge the central bank’s authority and the digital yuan (e-CNY).”
Hong Kong’s own stablecoin ecosystem had been hailed as a hotbed for fintech innovation and the tokenization of real-world assets.
Beijing’s intervention sends a clear message that private issuance will only be allowed if it fits in with national policy and even then only under very close supervision.
What’s This Mean for Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Scene?
The fact that major local players like Ant Group and JD.com have paused their initiatives somehow seals the deal as the ambition of becoming a regional hub for regulated stablecoin issuance is now facing some tough challenges.
As the SFC executive pointed out, there are serious concerns about the increased risk of fraud.
For investors and fintech firms, this stablecoin regulation update sends a clear message that the regulatory terrain is a lot more restricted than initially thought.
Issuance windows may shrink, licensing costs and compliance burdens may rise and timelines will be forced to extend.
Conclusion
The latest stablecoin regulation update in which Chinese regulators put the brakes on stablecoin plans by major tech firms in Hong Kong puts the spotlight on the intersection of innovation, sovereignty and regulation.
Hong Kong had been aiming to become the go-to place for stablecoin issuance, but the intervention of Beijing shows that the digital currency strategy is firmly in the control of the state.
For issuers, investors, and policymakers, this serves as a reminder that even in the most fintech-friendly regions, regulatory risk remains high and concerns about sovereignty take top priority.
Glossary
Stablecoin: a digital token that’s pegged to a fiat currency or asset; designed to keep prices stable.
Fiat-Referenced Stablecoin (FRS): a stablecoin that is backed by a fiat currency reserve, or equivalent, and requires a license to operate.
Monetary Sovereignty: a state’s right to mint its own money and control its monetary policy, including in the digital world.
Tokenization: the process of turning real-world assets into digital tokens for trading or settlement on a blockchain.
License Regime: a set of rules that issuers must follow in order to get a license to operate.
Frequently Asked Questions About Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Regulation Update
Why did the Chinese regulators decide to pull the plug on Hong Kong’s stablecoin plans?
Authorities cited concerns that private companies jumping into the stablecoin game; might chip away at the central bank’s power over currency issuance and challenge the digital yuan initiative.
What was Hong Kong’s role in the stablecoin scene before this regulatory shake-up?
Hong Kong passed its Stablecoins Ordinance in May 2025; and began accepting applications in August for issuers of fiat-referenced stablecoins (FRS); aiming to support tokenisation and fintech innovation.
Does this mean the end for stablecoin issuance in Hong Kong?
Not necessarily. The existing rules still stand, but it’s likely that issuance will slow right down and only happen if firms are willing to work within very strict regulatory parameters. Some firms might just decide to wait it out or rework their plans.
How does this update affect stablecoin issuance and markets around the world?
It shows that state control over digital currencies is still very much in the driver’s seat. Other regions are likely to take a more cautious approach or impose stricter rules; which could in turn shape global stablecoin standards.