As more firms diversify their crypto treasuries, Bitcoin-focused leaders are warning of rising confusion. David Bailey, CEO of Bitcoin treasury firm Nakamoto, claims “failed altcoins” are muddying the sector’s core narrative. His remarks follow recent moves by firms adding lesser-known tokens to their balance sheets under treasury strategies.
Treasury Sector Faces Pressure Amid Risky Asset Additions
Nakamoto CEO David Bailey voiced concerns over the sector’s direction, highlighting the growing involvement of failed altcoins in corporate treasuries. He criticized companies that include underperforming assets, saying they blur the financial purpose of crypto treasuries. In a recent post, Bailey stated the “treasury company moniker itself is confusing.”
According to Bailey, these strategies risk undermining the sector’s identity and integrity. He argued that toxic financing and rebranded failed altcoins distort public understanding. Bailey believes many of these assets lack vision and long-term sustainability.
He emphasized that “the core strategy is to build and monetize your balance sheet,” not chase market trends. He warned that companies without a clear plan will struggle to survive. “You will be consumed by someone who can do it better,” he said.
Also Read: Altcoins Price Prediction 2025: Avalanche, Hedera, and Litecoin Forecasts Outlook
Failed Altcoins Distract From Bitcoin Treasury Growth
Bailey said failed altcoins are undermining the model of Bitcoin-focused treasury companies. He compared Bitcoin treasury firms to banks in the fiat system, stating, “Today we are building Bitcoin Banks.” Bailey called for clarity, suggesting firms use terms like “Bitcoin financial institutions” if they fear stronger terminology.

He stressed that the sector is being tested as firms add risky assets. He implied that the practice dilutes Bitcoin’s value proposition as a reserve asset. This confusion, he added, results in unclear investor signals and weaker company performance.
His comments follow news that Mill City Ventures III plans to raise $500 million to support its Sui-based treasury strategy. Bailey did not name companies but criticized the broad trend of expanding into newer, often unstable altcoins. His concerns echo among others who advocate for Bitcoin-centric corporate strategies.
Growing Altcoin Exposure May Explain Bitcoin’s Flat Performance
Galaxy Digital reported that narrative-driven investing has driven firms toward Ether, Solana, XRP, and other non-Bitcoin tokens. Ether, in particular, attracts interest due to staking rewards, making it both an asset and income source. According to StrategicETHReserve, 3.14% of Ether’s total supply sits in publicly-listed treasury companies.
Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz suggested this altcoin exposure may explain Bitcoin’s recent price stagnation. “Bitcoin’s at a consolidation right now,” he said. “Partly because treasury companies in other coins take their shot.”

While Bitcoin remains dominant, alternative coins are gaining momentum in corporate portfolios. Data from BitcoinTreasuries.NET shows that publicly traded companies currently hold nearly $118 billion in Bitcoin. Meanwhile, interest in staking and returns is driving broader diversification.
Only the Strongest Bitcoin Treasuries Will Survive
Venture firm Breed issued a separate warning about Bitcoin treasury companies’ long-term viability. It said few will avoid a “death spiral” if they trade too close to their net asset value. Breed noted that the sector needs stronger governance to maintain investor confidence.
Bailey’s warning aligns with these concerns, as he pointed to a lack of structure in many treasury companies. He sees this as a signal that only well-managed Bitcoin treasuries will succeed. He maintains that those adding failed altcoins may risk financial instability.
Critics argue that altcoin-focused treasuries carry speculative risk rather than long-term value. Bailey supports this view and urges companies to define clear, Bitcoin-based strategies. As more firms adopt mixed portfolios, the industry faces increased scrutiny from both investors and analysts.
Also Read: Bitcoin vs Ethereum Treasuries: Saylor’s All-In Strategy vs Thiel’s Diversified Bet
Summary
David Bailey has raised serious concerns about the integrity of the treasury narrative as failed altcoins enter corporate balance sheets. He believes this trend distorts the purpose of Bitcoin treasuries and exposes firms to higher financial risks. With companies like Mill City Ventures III exploring Sui and others targeting staking-based assets, the Bitcoin-only strategy faces new tests. Industry observers suggest that only firms with disciplined, Bitcoin-led plans will avoid future market corrections.
For more crypto news or price predictions, visit our platform.
FAQs about Failed Altcoins in Corporate Treasuries
What are failed altcoins?
Failed altcoins are digital assets that have lost value, utility, or user trust, often due to weak development or poor governance.
Why is David Bailey critical of failed altcoins?
Bailey says failed altcoins confuse the treasury model and harm the reputation of Bitcoin-focused financial strategies.
Which companies are adding failed altcoins?
Firms like Mill City Ventures III are exploring treasury strategies involving altcoins such as Sui and other non-Bitcoin assets.
How does this impact Bitcoin?
Increased altcoin adoption in treasuries may dilute Bitcoin’s role and contribute to its sideways price action, according to experts.
What does ‘death spiral’ mean for Bitcoin treasury companies?
It refers to firms losing value rapidly due to poor asset management, often by trading too close to their net asset value.
Glossary of Key Terms
Failed Altcoins – Digital currencies that no longer serve practical use or have seen significant devaluation.
Treasury Company – A firm holding crypto assets, mainly Bitcoin, as a reserve or strategic financial move.
Bitcoin Bank – A proposed model where companies act like traditional banks but with Bitcoin as the reserve asset.
Net Asset Value (NAV) – The value of a company’s total assets minus liabilities, used to assess financial health.
Staking – A method in proof-of-stake blockchains where users lock coins to validate transactions and earn rewards.